Schumer’s Reasoning for Not Standing
By Bill Wilson, KIN Senior Analyst
WASH—Mar 18—KIN--The State of the Union address has long been a moment when the nation pauses, at least for a few minutes, to acknowledge shared principles. This year, one moment stood out. During the address, President Trump challenged members of Congress to stand if they agreed that the first duty of government is to protect American citizens rather than illegal immigrants. Republicans rose. Democrats stayed seated. Those who remained seated appeared to reject the a very foundation of the US Constitution. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) defended sitting, arguing that Democrats refused to stand because they disagreed with the administration’s immigration enforcement policies.
Schumer’s explanation was that Democrats do want to protect Americans, but that the president’s approach does not actually do so. In interviews after the speech, he argued that immigration enforcement agencies like ICE have violated Americans’ rights and therefore Democrats were justified in remaining seated. The reasoning may satisfy partisan allies, but it leaves many Americans scratching their heads. The question posed in that chamber was simple: should the government prioritize its own citizens? It was not a policy bill or a complex legislative proposal. It was a statement of principle. In politics, optics matter. When elected officials refuse to stand for something that basic, the image tells a story that explanations later cannot easily erase.
Adding to the confusion are the kinds of stories that have fueled public concern about immigration and federal programs. One recent report described how migrants allegedly exploited Medicare funds and then fled back to Cuba with the money, according to statements from federal officials. Incidents like that deepen the sense among many Americans that government programs meant to help citizens are vulnerable to abuse. Whether every allegation proves true or not, the perception of misuse is powerful. When leaders appear reluctant even to affirm that citizens should come first, it only reinforces the belief that Washington, in particular the Democratic Party, has lost sight of its priorities and oaths to uphold the Constitution.
That is why moments like the State of the Union matter. They are not merely about a president or a party. They are about the principles that bind a nation together. You can disagree with a president’s policies, challenge his rhetoric, and debate the details of enforcement, all part of a healthy republic. But when political calculation outweighs common sense, something is off. The Bible offers a warning about this kind of confusion. Proverbs 14:12 says, “There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death.” When reasoning becomes twisted enough to justify the unjustifiable, the result is predictable. This is, say it with me, Stupidocrisy.
Sources
https://www.breitbart.
https://apnews.com/